Bella Collina POA/HOA association, poor management, broken pavements, unsafe for jogging and walking, dangerous community. Dwight Schar, controls the POA/HOA with rubber stamp board members like Dr. Jeremy Spry and Paul LeBreux.
In a counter lawsuit filed against PSR Developers, which is owned by Rick Scharich and Paul LeBreux, it’s alleged that the two were involved in a possible real estate scam.
Attorney Paul R LeBreux works for Moodys Private Client and served as a rubber stamp for Dwight Schar on the Bella Collina POA board of directors. Now, he’s on the board of GameSquare Esports (CSE: GSQ).
Bella Collina sued: wedding, untargeted negligence, trademark violation, confusion to attract DCS’s potential customers, pecuniary gain, misappropriate his name and reputation, engaged in a scheme, extorting money, harm, intentional tort cases
Plaintiffs, CS Business Systems, Inc. and James L. Shelton, by and through the undersigned,
and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a) and in compliance with Local Rule 4.05
and 4.06, seek a preliminary injunction, stating as follows:
Within 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may file written objections to the Report and Recommendation’s factual findings and legal conclusions
Within 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may file written objections to the Report and Recommendation’s factual findings and legal conclusions.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION | DWIGHT SCHAR
Bella Collina HOA and POA are solely and fully controlled by Dwight Schar who was banned for life from the NFL
Bella Collina Residents Lawsuit Against: Paul Simonson, attorney James Ryan, Michael Ryan, The Ryan Law Group, DWIGHT SCHAR, David Burman, AEGIS COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT, Rick Scherich
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e), “[a] party may move for a more definite statement of a pleading to which a responsive pleading is allowed but which is so vague or ambiguous that the party cannot reasonably prepare a response.”
The second prong of Rule 23(b)(3) requires Plaintiffs to show that “a class action is superior to other available methods fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3). For this prong, the focus ‘is not on the convenience or burden of a class action suit per
“The typicality requirement in Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 measures whether a sufficient nexus exists between the claims of the named representatives and those of the class at large.
The two class definitions pled by Plaintiffs are sufficiently tailored to identify prospective class members without need for any individualized determinations to determine membership beyond certification that that the individual is or was a property owner in Bella Collina on the defined dates. This certification can be easily obtained by referencing public records.
In September, 2011 Bill Boylan (Alfreso Acquisitions) acting as a realtor, purchased a home on lot 383 for the Ruperts (cash) but put the title in Bill Boylans name and promptly moved in. Ruperts file a lawsuit against Bill Boylan to get possession of house
Before the Court is Defendants Bella Collina Towers, LLC, DCS Real Estate Investments, LLC, and DCS Real Estate Investments II, LLC,’s (collectively “DCS”) request for attorney’s fees relating to Plaintiff CS Business Systems, Inc.’s inadequate discovery responses.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Derivative action lawsuit against Bella Collina POA, Dennis Kelleher, Paul Lebraux, Jeremy Spry, DCS real estate investments, Dwight C. Schar, Spencer Schar, and Randall Greene
Plaintiffs, ANNA JURAVIN and DON K. JURAVIN, derivatively, on behalf of BELLA COLLINA PROPERTY OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, by and through the undersigned counsel. and sues Defendants listed above, stating as follows;
First Amendment to Second Amended and restated declaration of covenants, co-first Amendment to Second Amended and restated declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions for Bella Collina
AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR BELLA COLLINA (this “First Amendment”) is made and entered into this( 6th day of September, 2005, by GINN-LA PINE ISLAND LTD
Case No: 5:14-cv-678-JSM-PRL
UNITED STATES DISTRICTS COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION
This cause is before the Court following review of the Declaration of Michael D. Crosbie Regarding Revised Assessment of Attorney Fees Incurred (Doc. 233), filed May
This pile of garbage located at the entry is left for weeks because HOA does not care.