The second prong of Rule 23(b)(3) requires Plaintiffs to show that “a class action is superior to other available methods fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3). For this prong, the focus ‘is not on the convenience or burden of a class action suit per
“The typicality requirement in Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 measures whether a sufficient nexus exists between the claims of the named representatives and those of the class at large.